Troubleshooting --------------- .. highlight:: bash .. contents:: :local: .. _reading-logs: Reading bioconda-utils logs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For failed recipes, usually the easiest thing to do is find the first ``BIOCONDA ERROR``, and start reading the output below that line. The stdout and stderr for that failed build will end with the next ``BIOCONDA`` log line, likely a ``BIOCONDA BUILD START`` or ``BIOCONDA BUILD SUMMARY`` line. Note that there are two tests: the tests performed by conda in the main environment, and if they pass, the mulled-build tests performed in a minimal docker container. For working with failures in mulled-build tests, see :ref:`mulled-build-troubleshooting`. HTTP 500 errors ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sometimes recipes fail for reasons outside our control. For example, if anaconda.org returns an HTTP 500 error, that has nothing to do with the recipe but with anaconda.org's servers. In this case, you can restart the build by posting a comment with the line:: @BiocondaBot rebuild This will retrigger the build for the latest commit made to the PR in which the comment was made. HTTP 404 errors ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ HTTP 404 errors can happen if a url used for a recipe was not stable. In this case the solution is to track down a stable URL. For example this problem happened frequently with Bioconductor recipes that were up-to-date as of the current Bioconductor release, but when a new Bioconductor version came out the links would not work. The solution to this is the `Cargo Port `_, developed and maintained by the `Galaxy `_ team. The Galaxy Jenkins server performs daily archives of the source code of packages in ``bioconda``, and makes these tarballs permanently available in Cargo Port. If you try rebuilding a recipe and the source seems to have disappeared, do the following: - search for the package and version at https://depot.galaxyproject.org/software/ - add the URL listed in the "Package Version" column to your ``meta.yaml`` file as another entry in the ``source: url`` section. - add the corresponding sha256 checksum displayed upon clicking the Info icon in the "Help" column to the ``source:`` section. For example, if this stopped working: .. code:: yaml source: fn: argh-0.26.1.tar.gz url: https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/a/argh/argh-0.26.1.tar.gz md5: 5a97ce2ae74bbe3b63194906213f1184 then change it to this: .. code:: yaml source: fn: argh-0.26.1.tar.gz url: - https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/a/argh/argh-0.26.1.tar.gz - https://depot.galaxyproject.org/software/argh/argh_0.26.1_src_all.tar.gz md5: 5a97ce2ae74bbe3b63194906213f1184 sha256: 06a7442cb9130fb8806fe336000fcf20edf1f2f8ad205e7b62cec118505510db .. _zlib: ZLIB errors ~~~~~~~~~~~ When building the package, you may get an error saying that zlib.h can't be found -- despite having zlib listed in the dependencies. The reason is that the location of :conda:package:`zlib` often has to be specified in the ``build.sh`` script, which can be done like this: .. code:: bash export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$PREFIX/include" export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$PREFIX/lib" Or sometimes: .. code:: bash export CPATH=${PREFIX}/include Sometimes Makefiles may specify these locations, in which case they need to be edited. See the `samtools` recipe for an example of this. It may take some tinkering to get the recipe to build; if it doesn't seem to work then please submit an issue or notify ``@bioconda/core`` for advice. .. _perl-or-python-not-found: ``/usr/bin/perl`` or ``/usr/bin/python`` not found ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Often a tool hard-codes the shebang line as, e.g., ``/usr/bin/perl`` rather than the more portable ``/usr/bin/env perl``. To fix this, use ``sed`` in the build script to edit the lines. Here is an example that will replace the first line of a file ``$PREFIX/bin/alocal`` with the proper shebang line :: sed -i.bak '1 s|^.*$|#!/usr/bin/env perl|g' $PREFIX/bin/aclocal (note the ``-i.bak``, which is needed to support both Linux and OSX versions of ``sed``). It turns out that the version of `autoconf` that is packaged in the defaults channel still uses the hard-coded Perl. So if a tool uses `autoconf` for building, it is likely you will see this error and it will need some ``sed`` commands. See `recipes/exparna/build.sh`_ for an example to work from. .. _`recipes/exparna/build.sh`: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/blob/4bc02d7b4d784c923481d8808ed83e048c01d3bb/recipes/exparna/build.sh .. _mulled-build-troubleshooting: Troubleshooting failed ``mulled-build`` tests ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ After conda sucessfully builds and tests a package, we then perform a more stringent test in a minimal Docker container using ``mulled-build``. Notably, this container is designed to include only the package's runtime dependencies and as few other pieces of software as possible so this test can catch issues that the default conda test cannot. However the extra layer of abstraction makes it difficult to troubleshoot problems with the recipe. If the conda-build test works but the mulled-build test fails try these steps: - Run the test using the ``bootstrap.py`` method described in :doc:`building-locally`. - Look carefully at the output from ``mulled-build`` to look for Docker hashes, and cross-reference with the output of ``docker images | head`` to figure out the hash of the container used. - Start up an interactive docker container, ``docker run -it $hash``. You can now try running the tests in the recipe that failed, or otherwise poke around in the running container to see what the problem was. - If the test is failing due to missing dependencies, read the guidance on :ref:`test_dependencies` and move the tests with test dependencies into the ``run_test.sh`` file as necessary. Using the extended image ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For the vast majority of recipes, we use a minimal BusyBox container for testing and to upload to quay.io. This allows us to greatly reduce the size of images, but there are some packages that are not compatible with the minimal container. To support these cases, we offer the ability to in special cases use an "extended base" container. This container is maintained at https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-extended-base-image and is automatically built by DockerHub when Dockerfile is updated in the GitHub repo. Please note that **this is not a general solution to packaging issues**, and should only be used as a last resort. Cases where the extended base has been needed are: - Unicode support is required (especially if a package uses the ``click`` Python package under Python 3; see for example comments in `PR #5541`_ and `PR #6094`_). - ``libGL.so.1`` dependency - ``openssl`` dependency, e.g., through ``openmpi`` .. _`PR #5541`: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/pull/5541#issuecomment-323755800 .. _`PR #6094`: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/pull/6094#issuecomment-332272936 To use the extended container, add the following to a recipe's ``meta.yaml``: .. code:: yaml extra: container: extended-base: True ``g++`` or ``gcc`` not found ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The new conda build system brings its own compilers and system libraries. The specific compiler may vary between the target platforms, e.g. we use ``clang`` on MacOS and ``gcc`` on Linux. The name and path to the right compiler is therefore exported via environment variables. Just use ``$CC`` or ``$CXX`` instead of ``gcc`` or ``g++``. While some software, e.g. those built with ``autotools``, will pick up on this automatically, a lot of software has hard-coded compiler names in its ``Makefile``\s. Instead of using patches or ``sed`` to modify those Makefiles, you can often simply override Make variables from the command line:: make CC=$CC Briefly, Makefile variables can be specified inside the Makefile with the following operators: .. code:: Make VAR1 = content # assign with late recursive expand VAR2 := content # assign fixed VAR3 ?= content # assign default VAR4 += content # append All of these variables can be "overridden" from the command line as shown above. The final value no matter how many ``+=`` or similar operations are given inside the Makefile will be exactly what you stated on the command line. Only if the variable assignment is prefixed with the ``override`` keyword will Make ignore what you add to the command line. Variables that are never "set", so those only modified with ``?=`` (set if not already set) or ``+=`` (append) most likely will work just as expected. Example: .. code:: Make CC = g++ CFLAGS = -O2 -g -DVERSION=1.2.3 LDFLAGS += -lz - This Makefile sets ``CC`` to ``g++`` which you can simply override:: make CC=$CC - Since it *adds* ``-lz`` to ``LDFLAGS`` to enable linking against ``libz``, you do not need to do anything here. - The ``CFLAGS`` are more complicated. You can patch the Makefile to append to ``CFLAGS`` instead of overwriting:: sed -i.bak 's/CFLAGS =/CFLAGS +=/' Makefile Or you could override:: make CC=$CC CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DVERSION=1.2.3" In this case, the latter is not recommended as we would expect the version number to change with every new release of the upstream software.